-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20507/#review47923
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/master/master.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20507/#comment84160>

    Instead of persisting completed frameworks in the registry, I believe we 
would only persist registered (admitted) frameworks. 
    
    These frameworks could be re-registered (readmitted) so long as they are in 
the registry. Or, if the registry is non-strict then we would readmit 
regardless, akin to what is done for slaves.
    
    Could you update the TODO accordingly?



src/master/master.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20507/#comment84162>

    As Adam mentioned, this log message seems misleading because it's not 
necessarily after a failover timeout. Should we just say:
    
    "Framework FID attempted to re-register but is already completed"
    
    or
    
    "Completed framework FID attempted to re-register"
    
    This seems like a WARNING from the master's perspective, unless the 
importance of the framework is why you're making it an ERROR?



src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20507/#comment84164>

    Should we have another test for when the scheduler unregisters itself via 
stop()?


- Ben Mahler


On July 15, 2014, 12:38 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20507/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 15, 2014, 12:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1219
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1219
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is only a partial fix for MESOS-1219.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 86b147fce153fe3a241dbd841e033f2b7ca07b01 
>   src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp 
> ac65050bec5720b982f53d4dd6797cc3dee285dc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20507/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to