For reference:
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.html#auto

We should be able to adopt that wholesale but please document anywhere you
think we would diverge from those examples.

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Alex Rukletsov <[email protected]> wrote:

> We now start using auto in the code (among several other C++11 features).
> However we don't want to hamper reasoning about types. I would suggest we
> select several use cases where we all agree using auto is welcomed and
> several counterexamples. After the short conversation with BenH, we agreed
> that iterators on one side and Try<>, Option<> on the other side are first
> candidates for such list. I put the examples here
> <https://reviews.apache.org/r/25622/>.
>
> Any thoughts and ideas?
>



-- 
Dominic Hamon | @mrdo | Twitter
*There are no bad ideas; only good ideas that go horribly wrong.*

Reply via email to