----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25622/#review54629 -----------------------------------------------------------
Could you do a drive-by fix here to make the [web](http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/mesos-c++-style-guide/) version display the C++11 whitelist correctly? It seems to display correctly on [github](https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/docs/mesos-c%2B%2B-style-guide.md). On the web version I'm seeing: ## Empty Lines * 1 blank line at the end of the file. * Elements outside classes (classes, structs, global functions, etc.) should be spaced apart by 2 blank lines. * Elements inside classes (member variables and functions) should not be spaced apart by more than 1 blank line. ## C++11 We still support older compilers. The whitelist of supported C++11 features is: * Static assertions. * Multiple right angle brackets. * Type inference (`auto` and `decltype`). * Rvalue references. * Variadic templates. - Michael Park On Sept. 25, 2014, 11:47 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/25622/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 25, 2014, 11:47 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, Dominic Hamon, and > Till Toenshoff. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1793 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1793 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Explicitly prohibit the use of namespace aliases. The discussion about using > namespace aliases took place in [the other > review](https://reviews.apache.org/r/25434/#comment91754). The majority > agreed not to introduce them in code. > > Give examples of preferable way of using auto. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/mesos-c++-style-guide.md 59a39df > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25622/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Documentation change, no `make check` needed. > > > Thanks, > > Alexander Rukletsov > >
