-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25848/#review54955
-----------------------------------------------------------



include/mesos/module.hpp.in
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25848/#comment95277>

    MESOS_GET_AUTHOR_NAME -> MESOS_MODULE_AUTHOR_NAME
    Same for the next two items.



src/module/manager.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25848/#comment95278>

    Good thinking. MESOS_VERSION should be the default.


- Bernd Mathiske


On Sept. 29, 2014, 2:16 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25848/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 29, 2014, 2:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Bernd Mathiske, Niklas Nielsen, 
> and Timothy St. Clair.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1384
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1384
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adding a first class primitive, abstraction and process for dynamic library 
> writing and loading can make it easier to extend inner workings of Mesos. 
> Making it possible to have dynamic loadable resource allocators, isolators, 
> containerizes, authenticators and much more.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configure.ac 86d448c3ad00ad01d3d069c1039dc7ad524af567 
>   include/mesos/module.hpp.in PRE-CREATION 
>   src/Makefile.am 27c42dfde45a449750132e416b4eaf776f8c5e3b 
>   src/examples/test_module.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/examples/test_module_impl.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/examples/test_module_impl2.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/module/manager.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/module/manager.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/module_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25848/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran make check with added tests for verifying library/module loading and 
> simple version check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kapil Arya
> 
>

Reply via email to