----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/#review58122 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/master/master.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/#comment99026> is it ok for an executor to not have a framework id attached? src/tests/resource_offers_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/#comment99027> nit: it's not random, it's deterministic. Maybe "unknown" instead to indicate that you're testing that it's an unknown framework? - Dominic Hamon On Oct. 23, 2014, 1:57 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 23, 2014, 1:57 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Dominic Hamon. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1972 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1972 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Moved framework id validation from scheduler driver to master. > > Note that the check regarding incorrect use of both command info and executor > info is already present in the master. Killed it from the driver. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/master.cpp 95589b8f25a3e496eabc0cf84319c883c1ed7aec > src/sched/sched.cpp e89e5e56b72fec8832e99b90692d2cbd619fbcfb > src/tests/resource_offers_tests.cpp > 060039eed0bb8246ac034c0fb8560bfc7b25ab98 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Vinod Kone > >