> On Oct. 23, 2014, 9:57 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp, line 1906
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/diff/2/?file=731201#file731201line1906>
> >
> >     is it ok for an executor to not have a framework id attached?

yea, it's an optional field.


> On Oct. 23, 2014, 9:57 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
> > src/tests/resource_offers_tests.cpp, line 116
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/diff/2/?file=731203#file731203line116>
> >
> >     nit: it's not random, it's deterministic. Maybe "unknown" instead to 
> > indicate that you're testing that it's an unknown framework?

ok. used uuid to make it random :)


- Vinod


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/#review58122
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 23, 2014, 11:32 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 23, 2014, 11:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Dominic Hamon.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1972
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1972
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Moved framework id validation from scheduler driver to master.
> 
> Note that the check regarding incorrect use of both command info and executor 
> info is already present in the master. Killed it from the driver.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 95589b8f25a3e496eabc0cf84319c883c1ed7aec 
>   src/sched/sched.cpp e89e5e56b72fec8832e99b90692d2cbd619fbcfb 
>   src/tests/resource_offers_tests.cpp 
> 060039eed0bb8246ac034c0fb8560bfc7b25ab98 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27102/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to