----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27619/#review60029 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Excellent. Elegant and clean. Just update the comment and then we can commit it. src/tests/cram_md5_authentication_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27619/#comment101360> Why was this test explicitly creating new CRAMMD5Authenticator instead of using the default initializer with "CRAMMD5Authenticator authenticator;" like the previous tests? Doesn't seem like it did anything special with the pointer. src/tests/module.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27619/#comment101364> Fix the comment: "Now add our test Authenticator module" - Adam B On Nov. 5, 2014, 7:27 a.m., Till Toenshoff wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/27619/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 5, 2014, 7:27 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil Arya, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1894 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1894 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > see summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/authentication/cram_md5/authenticator.hpp 601248d > src/tests/cram_md5_authentication_tests.cpp 74ea2ad > src/tests/module.hpp 7970c28 > src/tests/module.cpp 482ed22 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27619/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Till Toenshoff > >
