> On Nov. 20, 2014, 10:39 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/libev.hpp, line 39
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28184/diff/3/?file=771698#file771698line39>
> >
> >     this makes me uncomfortable but i can't quite pin down why.
> >     
> >     would a better construction be:
> >     
> >         ThreadLocal<bool>* in_event_loop()
> >         {
> >           static ThreadLocal<bool> in_event_loop;
> >           return &in_event_loop;
> >         }
> >         
> >     which gets you lazy initialization of the thread local but without 
> > macro usage, and avoids the issue of the non-determinism of static 
> > initialization.

Cool, I like this better than the macros too! But lets make the static be a 
pointer so that it doesn't get cleaned up non-determinisitically at program 
shutdown. Also, I don't know what non-determinism you are referring to 
regarding static initialization?

Joris: can we do this for both __executor__ and __in_event_loop__ please? 
Thanks!


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28184/#review62448
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 20, 2014, 10:34 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28184/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 20, 2014, 10:34 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2125
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2125
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This improves performance by short-circuiting run_in_event_loop to just call 
> the lambda if it is already in the event loop.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/libev.hpp 04847e30b0d764d258b8c0971da87180043161f2 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> 00cd89f7645db4401c92de25d3516047a5e21ff1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28184/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 3rdparty/libprocess/benchmark improved throughput ~27%
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>

Reply via email to