> On Jan. 6, 2015, 6:06 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 1023
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29600/diff/1/?file=807137#file807137line1023>
> >
> >     I think this can be confusing pushing this into the top level, as it 
> > becomes unclear what this is used for especially with a very generic name 
> > with Task.
> >     
> >     What do you think about wrapping these with a internal namespace, so at 
> > least it's clear it's not intended as a public API.

Added a comment on top.


- Kapil


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29600/#review66940
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 9, 2015, 5:53 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29600/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 9, 2015, 5:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Niklas Nielsen, Till Toenshoff, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2096
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2096
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> [2/10] Build Mesos Modules outside Mesos source tree.
> 
> This prepares us to expose src/slave/containerizer/isolator.hpp as 
> <mesos/slave/isolator.hpp> and src/slave/state.hpp as <mesos/slave/state.hpp> 
> for inclusion for Isolator modules.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 540071db64961466eb75c779b3ea6863f4594437 
>   src/common/http.hpp afce7fea334c7bfa57efc48c413bf906a2ebde32 
>   src/common/type_utils.hpp 2d22db85f87ec5c1134208aae5b2105d2d267000 
>   src/common/type_utils.cpp fcc9eb0e27a9cbf53f7923f0c051a6578527ec37 
>   src/messages/messages.proto 16043dd934cbfc1159dad7adf366dfbfcc5a077b 
>   src/slave/state.hpp 592182b21ae2700c627f180db38ca5dc1b3c9e8a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29600/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kapil Arya
> 
>

Reply via email to