-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29918/#review69426
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Overall, LGTM!


src/slave/state.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29918/#comment114123>

    OK, that was my bad. Could you please rename those functions:
    
    s/write/checkpoint
    
    so that we know those internal functions are for the public checkpoint 
below.



src/slave/state.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29918/#comment114130>

    const google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<Resource>& messages = resources;
    return write(path, messages);



src/slave/state.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29918/#comment114120>

    s/wrappers/wrapper



src/slave/state.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29918/#comment114124>

    s/write/checkpoint



src/slave/state.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29918/#comment114121>

    Maybe you should call out in the comment that we are using temp + rename to 
ensure atomicity (all-or-nothing) semantics?



src/slave/state.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29918/#comment114125>

    s/write/checkpoint


- Jie Yu


On Jan. 22, 2015, 5 a.m., Michael Park wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29918/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 22, 2015, 5 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, Jie Yu, and 
> Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Introduced a generic checkpoint function.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/state.hpp 70777cf6ab681c29ca4df601fe47903e1dbdf41f 
>   src/slave/state.cpp a36fa53099300ee03f051b0f5eaaafe9f1da68d1 
>   src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp 809822e63b05a21418cd9297c927d656d6fd871d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29918/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael Park
> 
>

Reply via email to