> On Feb. 12, 2015, 9:06 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
> > src/linux/cgroups.hpp, line 344
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30545/diff/3/?file=862209#file862209line344>
> >
> >     if the caller is responsible for the lifetime of the process, this 
> > should be a unique_ptr (or Owned)
> 
> Chi Zhang wrote:
>     It would work for pressurelistener, which has the same lifetime of the 
> underneath listening libprocss.
>     
>     But in the case of the oom listening, cgroups::listen spawns (spawn only 
> takes a raw pointer) it off and returns. using a owned will have memory of 
> the running libprocess freed. Try::get() returns a const ref, so I can' 
> 'release' the raw pointer out of it.

s/can'/can't/


- Chi


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30545/#review72242
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 12, 2015, 8:08 p.m., Chi Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30545/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 12, 2015, 8:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Dominic Hamon, Ian Downes, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2136
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2136
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am 39ce858fd009f8aef388bd3d6b17aa4c885ff9c9 
>   src/linux/cgroups.hpp bf8efee05b995a37d4e6e7679a493b2d5238aa0b 
>   src/linux/cgroups.cpp b6f75b14dea7609b90627eccdd33ef891ed9d21f 
>   src/tests/cgroups_tests.cpp 9d50a47c939f5f136c85fdcc555459512c6f2259 
>   src/tests/memory_test_helper.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/memory_test_helper.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/memory_test_helper_main.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30545/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chi Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to