-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31471/#review75500
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/ip.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31471/#comment122625>

    For the same reason, please rename it to `isAny()` and add a comment here 
explaining what `Any` means.



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/ip.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31471/#comment122623>

    As we discussed offline, no need to pass in `seed`. `hash_combine` will 
internally call `hash_value`.



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/ip.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31471/#comment122620>

    As we discussed offline, please change the name of this function to:
    ```
    static IPNetwork LOOPBACK_V4();
    ```
    
    , because you already have IP and Network in the class name, no need to 
mentioned it again. Also, this is like a constant, so use all capital case.


- Jie Yu


On March 5, 2015, 7:39 p.m., Evelina Dumitrescu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31471/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 5, 2015, 7:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Dominic Hamon, Jie Yu, Joris Van 
> Remoortere, and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see summary
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/ip.hpp 
> 0cd7cb526a3a2514b3b54552253dfa8919e948d0 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/net.hpp 
> 9635bbc6f7dae1d75a780069fcc60fb706221053 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/ip_tests.cpp 
> fb98317a68986cb1228c584a8cd83b07737895a8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31471/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Evelina Dumitrescu
> 
>

Reply via email to