-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31444/#review77524
-----------------------------------------------------------


I wanted to try this in a VM with aurora, but I wasn't able to because, like 
James, I didn't see a place to set --chroot.


src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31444/#comment125618>

    James brought this up in his review, it looks like you're not plumbing 
through --chroot.  
    
    My read on this is that to fix MESOS-1404 the mesos-containerizer binary 
was introduced options like this were passed through using launchFlags in  
MesosContainerizerProcess::_launch
    
    Is that missing here?



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31444/#comment125616>

    This list-initialization doesn't work in gcc 4.4.7.  That's the version I 
had with a stock centos 6.4 box.
    
    gcc 4.4.7 currently compiles the master branch on github.com/apache/mesos 
so this is bumping up the minimum gcc required version.  I guess this c++11 
feature isn't used anywhere else in the code?
    
    I installed gcc 4.8.2 (and updated bintools) and it compiled.


- Jay Buffington


On March 17, 2015, 10:44 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31444/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 17, 2015, 10:44 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Chi Zhang, Dominic Hamon, Jay Buffington, Jie Yu, 
> and James Peach.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2350
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2350
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Optionally take a path that the launch helper should chroot to before 
> exec'ing the executor. It is assumed that the work directory is mounted to 
> the appropriate location under the chroot. In particular, the path to the 
> executor must be relative to the chroot.
> 
> Configuration that should be private to the chroot is done during the launch, 
> e.g. mounting proc and statically configuring basic devices. It is assumed 
> that other configuration, e.g., preparing the image, mounting in volumes or 
> persistent resources, is done by the caller.
> 
> Mounts can be made to the chroot (e.g., updating the volumes or persistent 
> resources) and they will propagate in to the container but mounts made inside 
> the container will not propagate out to the host.
> 
> It currently assumes that at least {{chroot}}/tmp is writeable and that mount 
> points {{chroot}}/{tmp,dev,proc,sys} exist in the chroot.
> 
> This is specific to Linux.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.hpp 
> 7c8b535746b5ce9add00afef86fdb6faefb5620e 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp 
> 2f2d60e2011f60ec711d3b29fd2c157e30c83c34 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31444/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual testing only so far. This is harder to automate because we need a 
> self-contained chroot to execute something in... Suggestions welcome.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ian Downes
> 
>

Reply via email to