-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32505/#review79369
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/master/master.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32505/#comment128640>

    How about moving this after `Master::reconcile()`?



src/tests/scheduler_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32505/#comment128645>

    s/> >/>> here and below.



src/tests/scheduler_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32505/#comment128648>

    Mind leaving a comment why we expect failure here? Maybe it makes sense to 
write a short comment to the test as well.


- Alexander Rukletsov


On April 3, 2015, 11:38 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32505/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 3, 2015, 11:38 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1127 and MESOS-330
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1127
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-330
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a new call added to explicitly shutdown an executor.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto 
> 783a63ad1cc0edd86605d638046fb959cb6e97e8 
>   src/master/master.hpp 05be911734b8d70c9fa5f3b4a275e8b610621fc5 
>   src/master/master.cpp 618db68ee4163b06e479cf3413eda4b63c9c5a4b 
>   src/messages/messages.proto 97c45c01dfcea38b1ae555c036d61e10c152c2c8 
>   src/scheduler/scheduler.cpp 584b042e32865fdf875bf41ebcfb7f9c327d882a 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 19e6b44bc344c0ca509674803f401cbb4e1f47ae 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 0f70ebafb0f5b16c560decc66e22a43a52732d09 
>   src/tests/scheduler_tests.cpp 4a89a7a88b50bb8c254f5076661ce07ac9fc7657 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32505/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to