Hey Arvind,

I actually asked Kasper to create proposed by laws.

>From my experience with other Apache projects having clear by laws how
podling should operate helps clarify some friction between contributors and
new potential contributors.

Since the project is small I think it is good time to have before it is too
late.

- Henry

On Monday, September 30, 2013, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:

> Hi Kasper,
>
> Thanks for putting the Bylaws together. While I don't think there is
> anything wrong in having bylaws in place, I do want to mention that they
> are typically used for projects that may have significant contention in
> operation and management. In the projects that I have actively worked on,
> we do not have any bylaws and whenever there is a policy decision needed -
> we just vote on it accordingly. It works very well for us as a matter of
> fact.
>
> This of course is a personal choice for the project and hence it is
> entirely upto you and MetaModel community to drive this. I just wanted to
> share this other point of view so that you are well informed.
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Henry Saputra 
> <[email protected]<javascript:;>
> >wrote:
>
> > Cool stuff Kasper, thanks for doing this.
> >
> > Would definitely love some inputs from other people in the community =)
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Kasper Sørensen
> > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I've adapted the bylaws of projects such as Apache Kafka and Hadoop
> into
> > a
> > > set of bylaws for MetaModel. Since we're still a pretty small community
> > (my
> > > impression at least) I downsides some of the minimal amount of votes
> > > required in the 'actions' section though. Would love everyone's input
> on
> > > the bylaws - if anything is missing, incorrect, not how you'd like to
> see
> > > it or whatever might come up!
> > >
> > > The draft bylaws can be found here:
> > > https://wiki.apache.org/metamodel/Bylaws
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Kasper
> >
>

Reply via email to