+1 for the idea of tagging. I would however prefer the tag names that focus on Jira than a person. As simple as traditional : Simple, Medium, Complex (or Basic, Intermediate, Advanced)
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 1:48 PM, George Vetticaden < gvettica...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > + 1. > We should get this documented on the wiki. > > > On Apr 16, 2016, at 2:08 PM, James Sirota <jsir...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > > > > Very cool. I like the idea. So we’ll standardize on tagging Jiras with > newbie and newbie++ > > > > Would anyone have a problem with us doing this? Or can propose an > alternate label scheme? > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > > > > > > > On 4/15/16, 1:16 PM, "David Lyle" <dlyle65...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I've been using: > >> > >> newbie for low complexity introductory Jiras: > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-87?jql=project%20%3D%20METRON%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20newbie > >> newbie++ for medium complexity introductory Jiras: > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-91?jql=project%20%3D%20METRON%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20%22newbie%2B%2B%22 > >> > >> In my experience, that's pretty standard. Anything more complex than > >> newbie++ is just untagged wrt complexity. > >> > >> -D... > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:19 PM, James Sirota <jsir...@hortonworks.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Guys, > >>> > >>> As we are picking up more community members I think we need to start > >>> tagging Jira’s with “complexity labels” and building up a pool of Jiras > >>> that newbies can work on. I wanted to open this up to the community > to see > >>> how we wanted to handle that. What should these labels be and how many > >>> label types would we want [newbie/internmediate/advanced]? How do > other > >>> Apache projects make it easy to onboard new community members? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> James > >>> > >
