Hi all,
Looks to me like the vast majority of the material mentioned below has been
committed. There are still 8 recent PRs that need review and, hopefully,
commit.
I’m going to go ahead and make a release branch, with the understanding that
any further commits (especially but not limited to Kerberization, Metron-UI,
Metron Management UI, or Mpack support), that come in over the next 36 hours or
so will still be included in the RC.
Does that meet everyone’s needs? I want to get started because it will
probably take a day or more just to create the branch, an RC build, and start
the sanity testing.
There’s enough major new stuff here that I’m going to call it 0.4.0. Is that
also okay with everyone?
Thanks,
--Matt
On 4/5/17, 6:23 PM, "Ali Nazemian" <alinazem...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Metron Devs,
As Metron users/customers, we are very keen to have all high priority
related features/bugs to the Security as well as Metron-UI and Metron
Management-UI.
Thanks,
Ali
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Ryan Merriman <merrim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We just finished responding to the first round of feedback so I don't
think
> we're that far away on METRON-623.
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Matt Foley <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Totally agree would be good to have MPack support. Let’s see how it
> > goes. Wouldn’t want to cut it out for the sake of a day or two.
> >
> > On 4/5/17, 1:14 PM, "Justin Leet" <justinjl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've made fairly good progress on
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-799 (The MPack should
> > function
> > in a kerberized cluster). The PR itself might cut close to the
> > deadline,
> > and in particular might be tough to get reviewed in time.
> >
> > I'll do a best effort attempt to get it in to make our Kerberos
story
> > more
> > complete, but I'd say the release can go on without this (and we use
> > manual
> > Kerberos in its absence).
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matt Foley <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Sure. To be clear, I wasn’t proposing an exclusive list, just
> > making the
> > > argument that there seemed to be enough to proceed with. Any duly
> > > committed content in the master branch, at the time we create the
> > first RC
> > > (ie, some time after METRON-623 goes in, but not before Monday)
> will
> > surely
> > > be included in the RC, unless something has a bug that can’t be
> > readily
> > > resolved.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Matt
> > >
> > > On 4/5/17, 12:56 PM, "David Lyle" <dlyle65...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm working on METRON-826 right now. I'll have a PR up today
or
> > > tomorrow at
> > > the latest. I'd like to see it go as well.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-826
> > >
> > > -D...
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Nick Allen <n...@nickallen.org
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would like to include #509 with the Fastcapa
improvements..
> > > Already have
> > > > a +1. I'm just letting it soak giving others some time to
> > review if
> > > they
> > > > feel so inclined.
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/509
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:50 PM, James Sirota <
> > jsir...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I second this. I want to see 623 go in in addition to the
> > > kerberos work.
> > > > > When both are in I think it makes sense to do the release
> > > > >
> > > > > 04.04.2017, 11:33, "Simon Elliston Ball" <
> > > si...@simonellistonball.com>:
> > > > > > I'd really like to see METRON-623 (the ui) get into the
> > release.
> > > It
> > > > > feels like the current PR review is getting close, and
that
> > > getting it in
> > > > > then focussing on follow on tasks in a separate release
> > would work
> > > well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would be all for getting a release out if only for the
> > > Kerberos work.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Simon
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 4 Apr 2017, at 20:15, zeo...@gmail.com <
> > zeo...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> How far out is the management UI?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Jon
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017, 2:09 PM Matt Foley <
> > ma...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Hi all,
> > > > > >>> Although it’s only been a few weeks since the last
> > release was
> > > > finally
> > > > > >>> published, that process started in January :-)
> > > > > >>> Also, the last commit in 0.3.1 was Feb 23, and
there’s
> > been a
> > > ton of
> > > > > >>> really cool new stuff added since then:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Biggest items:
> > > > > >>> - Multiple commits for REST API (base Jira:
> METRON-503)
> > > > > >>> - Multiple commits to work with Kerberized (secure)
> > clusters
> > > (mult.
> > > > > Jiras)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Other major new features:
> > > > > >>> - METRON-690: DSL-based sparse time window
> > specification for
> > > > Profiler
> > > > > >>> - METRON-733: Remove Geo db from ParserBolt
> > > > > >>> - METRON-686: Record rule set that fired during
Threat
> > Triage
> > > > > >>> - METRON-743: Sort files when reading results from
> Pcap
> > > > > >>> - METRON-701: Triage metrics produced by Profiler
> > > > > >>> - METRON-744: Stellar external functions loaded from
> > HDFS
> > > (and huge
> > > > > >>> speed-up for function resolution)
> > > > > >>> - METRON-694: Index errors from Topologies, and
> > > > > >>> - METRON-745: Create Error dashboards
> > > > > >>> - METRON-712: Separate eval from parse in Stellar
> > > > > >>> - METRON-765: Add GUID to messages
> > > > > >>> - METRON-793: Updated to storm-kafka-client spout
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> We’ve also had numerous bug fixes, docs improvements,
> > and
> > > > > improvements to
> > > > > >>> deployment tools (docker, ansible, mpack, quickdev,
> and
> > > fulldev).
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I think the REST API and Kerberization, by
themselves,
> > would
> > > > justify a
> > > > > >>> release. Along with the others, I’d like to propose
> > that we
> > > make a
> > > > > release
> > > > > >>> soon. The time frame I had in mind was at the end of
> > this
> > > week I
> > > > > could cut
> > > > > >>> a release branch (so on-going work in master doesn’t
> get
> > > blocked)
> > > > and
> > > > > start
> > > > > >>> the process of generating an RC.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> What do you-all think?
> > > > > >>> Also, what additional work do you think should be
> > included in
> > > this
> > > > > >>> release, and can it realistically get done by the end
> > of this
> > > week?
> > > > > The
> > > > > >>> time frame is, of course, flexible at the pleasure of
> > the
> > > community
> > > > –
> > > > > but
> > > > > >>> also, there will be another release in another couple
> > months
> > > or so,
> > > > > so no
> > > > > >>> need to rush stuff.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>> --Matt
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Jon
> > > > >
> > > > > -------------------
> > > > > Thank you,
> > > > >
> > > > > James Sirota
> > > > > PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating)
> > > > > jsirota AT apache DOT org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
A.Nazemian
