Trustin Lee schrieb:
Hi Gaston,
On 11/29/06, Gaston Dombiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds good to me. BTW, do you have an estimate (or range) for MINA 2.0?
Today I read that trunk (i.e. 2.0) is 10%-20% faster than 1.0 or branch
1.1. We are now in the process of adopting MINA as the networking layer
for Wildfire. I would like to see if our roadmaps/milestones match
nicely. :) FYI, I'm using branch 1.1 for our development.
There's no estimate so far actually. What we actually have to focus is
documentation of MINA 1.0. You won't see any difference in performance if
your connection last for a long time. It only affects when the number of
connections are small and disconnection occurs often. Of course, it's
entirely up to your team whether to use trunk or not. :)
Trustin
If you refer to my last post: There is a measurable difference between
0.x and newer versions, but non documented from my side between 1.x and
trunk. The mentioned 10%-20% come here from a test with Java 6 against
Java 5, which I have made with the trunk.
The test performed very well under heavy load (24.000 connections sent
every 10 seconds 300 Bytes of bundeled string messages, which were
demultiplexed to different decoders, decoded to POJOs and written to a
MySQL database as batches). All this happened on a simple Xeon Dualcore
with at least under 50 percent of load.
Best Regards
Michael
