Hi, On 3/21/07, Coding Horse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Trustin, I really appreciate your wonderful explanation! Could you also shed some light on this case when you have time: When decodable() is called there are 3.5 complete packets of MyPacket, my decode() implementation will take out each complete MyPacket and leave the remaining untouched to wait for more data. In my previous post I said I just took out exact one MyPacket and return OK - I didn't care how many MyPacket are inside current buffer as long as it contains at least one complete MyPacket. It seems to work for me because I found inside decodable() the buffer position was adjusted automatically by one MyPacket after I "get" one MyPacket out in decode(). I just want to know if this is the recommended way to achieve what I expected.
Yes, it's the recommended way. Please decode one message at once in decode() implementation. MINA will call decodable() and decode() again if there's more to decode. HTH, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
