If so, why doesn't Mina design the classes DI comparable? So we don't need make these integration classes? Am I right? Just a thought.
On 8/16/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If using PicoContainer, I still have to make the pico-integration classes > like mina-integration classes? > > On 7/18/07, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jul 17, 2007, at 6:43 PM, Rob Butler wrote: > > > To use Spring for configuring MINA or not is of course a personal > > > choice. I very much like using Spring to configure MINA. It has > > > made adding filters and other configuration very easy. > > > > agreed that its a personal choice. > > > > personally, i'm sick of gobs of XML configuration and wire MINA up by > > hand, or by using PicoContainer. > > > > -pete > > > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi > > > > > > > > > > >
