On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:42:37 +0900 "Trustin Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/20/07, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 14, 2007, at 2:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Renamed TransportType to IoServiceMetadata because it stands what > > > it does more precisely > > > > This name seems odd to me.. I think of a 'service' as what I'm > > providing.. and MINA makes my service available over various > > transports (TCP,UDP,in-VM, etc) > > > > I do agree about it being 'Metadata' vs 'Type' though. > > > > How about TransportMetadata? Sound good for me too > > TransportMetadata sounds good. Then should we rename > IoService.getMetadata() to getTransportMetadata()? We could also Yes, will be more understandable. > resurrect IoSession.getTransportMetadata() (was: getTransportType()). I liked this API change, since it's quite redundant. Julien
