> [X]: Retain them. For another reason. It's not because MINA is all about IO that those classes should not start or contains 'IO'. It can be very confusing sometime if we have an overlap with another class from another package.
For some reasons, I felt quite confused when using MINA ByteBuffer, because the name is the same than the basic NIO ByteBuffer. I would not have picked this name... MINAByteBuffer would have been a good exemple of what I would like to have. I know that some people think we should _always_ use the full package name instead of simply the class name in the code (org.apache.mina.common.ByteBuffer instead of simply ByteBuffer), but I do think that those kind of peope should be buried under their own code :) (Don't laugh, I have already met such a strange person... Was in in Waco, Tx ? Don't remember ;) E. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
