MINAByteBuffer, because it's MINA, not Mina and I like obvious names :) Julien
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:14:56 +0900 "Trustin Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > It is often confusing to discriminate MINA ByteBuffer and NIO > ByteBuffer. Do we need renaming? I didn't have much difficulties > actually because most Java code doesn't use both types at the same > time. > > There was an opinion about renaming it to MinaByteBuffer, but I don't > think it's the best name available for us. I think DataBuffer, > ExtendedByteBuffer, ExtendedBuffer or just Buffer might also be a > candidate. There's Buffer in NIO, too, but nobody uses that class > directly. > > I'd like to find the best name; short and not confusing one. Please > don't hesitate to respond to this message with your idea so we can > find out the best alternative. > > Trustin
