On 9/27/07, Irving, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trustin Lee wrote: > > ... > > > So.. I have no concrete idea on this naming issue. > > Any idea is appreciated! > > I'd like, if possible, to stick with what we agreed on last year at the > start of the process (I.e. keeping the name): > > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--pre-proposal--AsyncWeb-p5359826.html > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--pre-proposal--AsyncWeb-p5360217.html > > IMHO, on a lighter note, mina-http just sounds sooo boring :o)
I was just a bit hesitant because we got a client module. Then shall we go with mina-asyncweb? I think we should put codecs and related message classes under http-filter-codec-http though. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
