Hi Trustin, Well, I am sometime (always ?) quite long in my email and obviously not necesseraly more clear than others.. ;-)
The problem I found (is this a problem, I don't know) is : 1) In the past, only DemuxingIoHandler has messageSent() function to overload but not mandatory (you can if you want not define anything). In my code, I had some codes to do some stuff after the message is really sent. 2) Now, in trunk, MessageHandler has a mandatory messageSent() function. As when you use DemuxingIoHandler, you should use also object that extends MessageHandler, I feel like a bit loose. Contrary to what I wrote before, I would not suggest to remove the messageSent() from DemuxingIoHandler since a message can be sent, even if no MessageHandler is registered for it. I try in my code, and I saw "DemuxingIoHandler.messageSent()" called for such message not registered. Now the question : If one messageHandler is registered and such a message is sent, which function will be called ? DemuxingIoHandler.messageSent() on all messages ? or only on not registered messages ? MessageHandler.messageSent() on all messages that are registered ? Or only one (for registered message) ? As I need to do some stuff after message is sent, I don't know if I need to writye the same code (or so) in each messageSent() of MessageHandler. I hope I am more clear, this time. And for JMX, I was starting to think about it since I feel like I really should improve this part in my app. So thank you for this ! I start probably this week some benchmark (I hope almost all my port to "new" trunk is done). After that, I could spend some useful time on JMX approach... Frederic ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trustin Lee" On Nov 22, 2007 5:40 PM, fred.bregier wrote: > I suppose the one from MessageHandler is the one that would be executed, > right ? > > Since we must defined messageSent function in MessageHandler > (mandatory), second it is not mandatory to get it in DemuxingIoHandler, > third as you said only one will be called (the one from > MessageHandler ?), I would say that probably this function in > DemuxingIoHandler is no more necessary and probably confusing with the > one from MessageHandler. > Except if one can use DemuxingIoHandler with something totally different > from MessageHandler (?), I would suggest to remove this function (or mark > it as deprecated and pointing to the one in MessageHandler). WDYT ? I didn't get the question actually. Could explain again? Thanks in advance, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6