On Dec 18, 2007 3:34 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trustin Lee wrote: > > <snip/> > > > However, taking > > the item #4 into picture, it leads me to think we need a thin built-in > > layer for logging that is dedicated to MINA. > Please, don't ! This is MINA, a Network framework, not a Logger > framework ! We already have so many meta-meta-meta-loger around there:)
Yeah, it's a framework and I don't want it to force others to use the logging framework of our preference. Why should we do that? Because we are satisfied with SLF4J? Yes I am, but it simply doesn't make any sense to other people. As David said, what would people think if he or she has mina-core.jar, slf4j-log4j12.jar, log4j.jar and commons-logging.jar? Moreover, what I am suggesting is not about embeding another logging framework but adding a few logger classes, which is minimal, and it will not be used anywhere outside of MINA code itself. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
