It's really nice to see you guys cooperating. Let me look forward to the incoming patches. :-)
Cheers, Trustin On Jan 16, 2008 4:37 AM, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keep in mind, I made a Mina 2 branch of AHC in the Geronimo sandbox a > few weeks back...Its basically the same as the AHC Mina 1, but the APIs > ere changed to work with Mina 2. > > But the Mina version is significantly different from the one in G right now. > > Jeff > > > Sangjin Lee wrote: > > On 1/15/08, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Trustin Lee wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Kevan, > >>> > >>> On Jan 12, 2008 2:59 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> Note that this is cross-posted to geronimo dev and mina dev lists... > >>>> Hopefully the last one... > >>>> > >>>> Alex and Trustin, > >>>> Thanks for the info... More below... > >>>> > >>>> On Jan 9, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Trustin Lee wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Well, I think it's OK for the Geronimo team to fork AHC, and I'd > >>>>> like > >>>>> to respect them if Jeff already gave the information that his AHC > >>>>> work > >>>>> will be placed under MINA trunk. They have their release schedule > >>>>> and > >>>>> I don't want to let them wait for us. They will need to migrate to > >>>>> the official MINA AHC eventually though. Jeff could show us better > >>>>> road map for this. > >>>> Sounds like a good plan. We wouldn't necessarily *have* to migrate, > >>>> but I, for one, would expect that we'll *want* to migrate to Mina > >>>> (once Mina was able to release the functionality and assuming Mina is > >>>> as good as AHC... ;-) > >>> AHC already depends on MINA. For now, MINA has older version of AHC > >>> as a submodule, and Jeff is trying to move the stuff in the G sandbox > >>> here. > >> Right. Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I should have said something like > >> "we'll *want* to migrate from Geronimo AHC to a Mina AHC..." > >> > >>> > >>>> Sangjin, Rick, *and* Jeff have been making a number of changes and > >>>> enhancements to AHC in our sandbox. Looks like some nice stuff... I > >>>> would assume you'd be interested in their work (and would guess > >>>> they'd > >>>> like to share it with you)? Best to work out those details on mina > >>>> dev, I would think... Rick has been a G committer for a while... > >>>> Sangjin is new to our community, but has been making a number of good > >>>> contributions to AHC. > >>> Sure we are! Please feel free to start to make contribution. :) > >>> > >>> BTW is there any express procedure for accepting the existing AHC > >>> committers (i.e. Sangjin and Rick) in the MINA PMC? As you know, they > >>> are not ASF members and didn't contribute directly to the MINA project > >>> so far. I wonder what I am supposed to do. Should I wait for some > >>> patches from them just like we do for most people? > >> Sangjin is not a Geronimo committer, but has been making some nice > >> contributions... > >> > >> There's no express procedure for moving code from Geronimo to Mina. > >> You can always just copy the code. However, best, if Sangjin and Rick > >> engaged with your community -- explaining their changes, and > >> submitting patches. I'm suggesting that they do that, but it's their > >> decision to make... > >> > >> --kevan > > > > > > > > As Kevan said, I'm not yet a Geronimo committer, but I've been actively > > providing patches around AHC, and I hope I'd be a committer soon. It'd be > > nice to become a Mina committer as well. :) > > > > I agree the right thing to do is for us to resubmit patches to Mina. Since > > the version of Mina the Geronimo AHC is based on is 1.1.x, I suspect simple > > copy just won't work. We could essentially "replay" our patches (presumably > > in the same order), making sure things work correctly at each step. How > > does that sound? > > > > Thanks, > > Sangjin > > > -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
