On Feb 11, 2008 7:37 AM, Mike Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The new logging features in SLF4J and removing IoSessionLogger were what > was holding up an M1 release. Where do we stand on the logging front > right now?
see my comments on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-513 "IoSessionLogger has been removed, but I could not yet add MDC-aware Formatter implementations because the new SLF4J hasn't been released. " Meanwhile Ceki has published an SLF4J-API-1.5.0-M0 in maven. I will commit the formatter asap (hopefully tonight CET) and close this issue. Maarten > > -Mike > > Maarten Bosteels wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2008 9:05 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Feb 10, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Maarten Bosteels wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> On Feb 10, 2008 5:28 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Is it ready? You're only at M1. What are the next milestones > >>>> planned > >>>> before you hit beta? > >>> > >>> The version numbering scheme is described at the bottom of > >>> http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html [1] > >>> > >>> IMO we should have created 2.0-M0 a few months ago. But for some > >>> reason we > >>> have been postponing it as long as there were open JIRA issues that > >>> could > >>> require an API change. > >>> > >>> According to [1] we are allowed to make API changes between M1 and M2 > >>> but of course it's nicer for the user if we can avoid it. > >>> > >>> I just had a look at JIRA at there were more open issues than I > >>> thought (6) > >>> but no show-stoppers AFAICS. > >>> > >>> Maybe we should have a vote about cutting 2.0-M0 ? > >> Maybe I'm being dense. You mean 2.0-RC1? When do you guys cut a > >> branch to stabilize your beta? Does it depend on the situation? > >> > > > > Good question. > > > > In my very humble opinion "cutting 2-0-M1" means : > > (a) creating a 2.0 branch > > and > > (b) creating a 2.0-M1 tag > > > > All further development for 2.0 would then happen on the 2.0 branch > instead > > of on the trunk. > > Isn't that the usual way to proceed ? > > > > Maarten > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> Alan > >> > >> > > > >
