이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote: <snip>
> So, I guess we need some pluggability in domain name resolution. For > now, we are using InetSocketAddress and as long as we depend on it, we > don't have any control over how domain name is resolved in MINA. This > mean that we need to provide our own endpoint representation classes. > It will probably cause the major API change, but I think it worth to do > this. How does that sound? Will we need to implement this in 2.0 or... > in 3.0? :) Unless we already have some DNS client code that we're comfortable with, I think we should push this off to a 2.1 or 3.0 release. -Mike
