So, Tapestry 4 ships with OGNL and Javassist, http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/tapestry/tapestry-project-4.1.5-bin.tar.gz Why is this a problem for MINA?
Javassist can be redistributed under the MPL _or_ under the LGPL. It doesn't have to be distributed under BOTH, see http://labs.jboss.com/javassist/ I don't see this as a problem unless the board is deciding on whether or not the MPL 1.1 is ok in spite of all the precedence. -Mike Alex Karasulu wrote: > FYI the board met a couple days ago I think to discuss this specific issue > of third party licenses. We should check and see what they concluded on > this 3rd party licensing matter. > > Alex > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Mike, thanks for your diligence on this release. >> >> However I might have some bad news tho: I hope I'm wrong. I just now took >> a cursory look at the dependencies. It seems we have some MPL/LGPL >> dependencies unfortunately :(. Specifically the ognl integration module >> depends on ognl and that depends on javassist which is LGPL. I hope I'm >> wrong since I have not had time to completely verify. Could someone double >> check for me. I hope there's something we can do about it. >> >> Also let's make sure we do a good audit of the dependencies along with RAT >> runs. We may want to use the maven RAT plugin to automatically do this for >> us. >> >> Alex >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Mike Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> The vote has been closed and hare are the results. >>> >>> Binding +1s (7): >>> >>> Niklas Gustavsson >>> Mike Heath >>> Alex Karasulu >>> Emmanuel Lécharny >>> Trustin Lee >>> Niklas Therning >>> Julien Vermillard >>> >>> >>> Non-binding +1s (8): >>> >>> Maarten Bosteels >>> Frédéric Brégier >>> Jeff Genender >>> Brenno Hayden >>> Edouard De Oliveira >>> José Henrique de Oliveira Varanda >>> Cameron Taggart >>> Mark Webb >>> >>> >>> I will try to get this release out this weekend. >>> >>> -Mike >>> >>> Mike Heath wrote: >>>> Hello Community, >>>> >>>> It looks like Maarten has resolved DIRMINA-513. I don't see any >>> reason >>>> to hold up a 2.0-M1 release. >>>> >>>> There are a multitude of changes in MINA 2.0-M1, too many to enumerate >>>> in a single email. A laundry list of changes going into this release >>>> can be found here >>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel >>>> This release should not be considered final nor entirely stable. It >>> is >>>> a release so that developers using MINA know what to expect in 2.0 as >>>> well as help us to find bugs and deficiencies in the API. >>>> >>>> [ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1 >>>> [ ]: 0, Abstain >>>> [ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M1 >>>> >>>> -Mike >>>> >>> >
