> Julien Vermillard wrote > > On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:37:57 +0200 > Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Julien Vermillard wrote: > > > I propose : > > > void write(..) as default > > > and a > > > WriteFuture writeWithFuture(..); > > > or something else if someone got a better idea because I'm not sure > > > to have the best wording here ;) > > > > > > WDYT ? > > > Julien > > > > > Why not simply > > > > void write( ... ) > > > > and > > > > WriteFuture writeFuture( ... ) ? > > > > damn I'm an idiot ;) how I can missed this solution.
If you don't want to break backward compatibility, perhaps something like: WriteFuture write(...) void writeAndForget(...) regards
