On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niklas Gustavsson wrote: >> My feeling is that the cons outweigh the pros. Having multiple JARs >> commonly turns out to confuse users, especially with a setup where you >> can even get the very basic functionality working without choosing >> your combination of JARs. > > With Maven, this is not really a big issue, IMHO. Consider that it's a one > time burden...
My worry is not around how to perform the actual work setting things up, but rather how much a potential consumer would have to understand about MINA before she can get going. > But even if we keep only one jar, I think we still have to create some new > packages, because we have a big bag of classes in common, which make it > quite difficult to find what are the relations between each classes. I certainly agree. /niklas
