Hi, I fail to see strong advantages of having multiple jars. Having more packages seems like a good idea though.
Maarten. On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Niklas Gustavsson wrote: >>> My feeling is that the cons outweigh the pros. Having multiple JARs >>> commonly turns out to confuse users, especially with a setup where you >>> can even get the very basic functionality working without choosing >>> your combination of JARs. >> >> With Maven, this is not really a big issue, IMHO. Consider that it's a one >> time burden... > > My worry is not around how to perform the actual work setting things > up, but rather how much a potential consumer would have to understand > about MINA before she can get going. > >> But even if we keep only one jar, I think we still have to create some new >> packages, because we have a big bag of classes in common, which make it >> quite difficult to find what are the relations between each classes. > > I certainly agree. > > /niklas >
