On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:40:00 +0530 harbhanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the prompt reply!! > > > > I too would recommend to post some notifications for this change... > it took me two working days to find that it's moved > > > > I suppose that since there are some major modifications to AsyncWeb, > the implementation by Dan wouldn't work straightaway. > > Just to avoid any reinvention, did anybody try to port the same i.e. > CXF transport, for latest Asyncweb + Mina? > > > > Also, any pointers on the major modifications would also serve great > help. Thanks!! > > Hi, For the change on the server I seen : - http decoder rewrote using mina codec state machine - static file server module added for serving plain old static files - http service mapper using regexp in place of full url matching As some side project a fast-cgi implementation, you can find some info about that on this ML Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
