On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:19:11 +0200 Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> IMHO, IoEvent and IoEventType belongs to an event package, under > >>> the session package. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> IMO two classes are not enough reason to create a package. Also we > >> need to be careful about move too many things around needlessly. > >> Remember each change you make will impact users. > >> > >> Alex > >> > > > > Hi, > > > > for session.event & session.config it's not enought for a package > > > ok. Makes sense. > > for write, it should go in session because it really tied to session > > > session.write ? > > > > Now I start to wonder why we got this "common" package perhaps all > > that can go directly to o.a.mina root ? > > > This will impact all the imports in ftpserver and asyncweb, but we > can do it. > > > Julien > > > > > > Thanks Emmanuel for the big commit, everything is compiling fine here. Everybody will need to rename there import in mina 2.0 apps. Now I would like to discuss about the *.common.* package ? does we need it ? I think no, it's increasing import length for no much gain. Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
