Ok, ok, I have to admit that my proposal was not that good :)
So let's move to something more sane, which seems to gather more
approval : reviewing the packages we have in mina-core.
More to come...
Mark Webb wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't really have a specific view point on this topic. I would rather
have more efficient and easily maintained internals. I don't know if this
accomplishes that but I'm sure you guys can hash that out.
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
I do not think this is a good idea.
Looking at the three answers, it seems so ;)
3. We may confuse things for alot of people who may already be using
2.0. Telling users that they will have to fix their code because of a
re-organization looks bad on our part IMHO.
Regardless to the refactoring question, this is the kind of risk we have to
consider, in any case. More than confusing the users who have based their
code on the current 2.0 stack, I think it's much more important to build a
coherent stack we will live with for a long time. Waiting for a 3.0 version
and differing refactoring just because we have users of the current trunk is
certainly not a good idea. Trunk is trunk, using it is a risk, and it's well
know.
Thanks !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
