On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:46:58 +0200 "Niklas Gustavsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Julien Vermillard > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it's helping to review the build process too :) > > Of course, but those options does not exclude each others :-) > > > Anyway for the one who prefer binaries : > > http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/ > > I'm feeling incredibly annoying today, but having the real release > candidates would have been the optimal solution. That is, not SNAPSHOT > builds, RAT report and including hash files. For example using the > Maven staging support. Anyways, let's do that for the next release. > > For this release, I've built, ran RAT, reviewed the source and > binaries. Looks good. > > +1 for release. > > /niklas Yes, very true, the problem is for producing all the artifact, actually it's a few hours (last time it took me half a day) for generate and verify everything (signature files, reports, binaries, etc..). Perhaps we should do a two stage vote, one for saying current branch is ok for releasing, then if it's accepted, someone do the tedious release dry-run job, and a second vote for reviewing the related artifacts. Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
