one additional note I have is that maybe it should be moved from core to util. That way the package name indicates that it is a utility class and not a core class.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Webb wrote: > >> +1. Its not hurting anything being there, and unless you know what its >> for, >> you will probably not use it. >> >> > > Funny :) I guess that now that I have posted the first mail, there are more > people aware about this class than ever, and now the risk is that we may > have to deal with it, as some may want to implement an inherited class, when > remaining silent and saying nothing about it would have let this class > hidden and unused forever ;) > > Sometime it's better to push the dust under the carpet and shut up :) > > Ok, I'm done with MonitorException, moving to some more useful things ! > > Thanks guys ! > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
