I agree completely with all of Niklas's comments.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niklas Gustavsson wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> I think we should focus on getting 2.0 out the door. We have been >>> working on it long enough and I think there are many people using it >>> in production or near-production systems. Once we release, we will >>> probably get alot more feedback and can use that feedback to >>> enhance/fix the next version. >>> >> >> Big +1. We will find areas that we would like to improve during the >> foreseeable future (this change and ByteBuffer comes to mind). >> > > yop. And I don't see how we can include that in 2 weeks... >> >> Including all such changes will delay 2.0 for a long time, long enough >> for MINA to get behind other frameworks. Having a real release out >> will mean getting further feedback from users, so far I haven't seen a >> lot of users requesting this change nor the ByteBuffer change. I think >> we're too critical, the code is great. > > Well, IMHO, the code works. Saying that it's great is another story :) (but > this might just be a matter of taste ...) > > Anyway, I agree with what you say. We don't release fast enough. Atm, > regardless to the current code quality, and performance, I think MINA 2 is > usable, even if there are still some issues to fix. I will do some quick > perf tests on ADS with MINA 2 and give you some feedback soon. > >> Release early, release often. >> We do neither. >> > > eh ;) >> >> >>> >>> I would think that we should move right >>> towards 3.0. >>> >> >> I say go work on a branch (as already suggested) and see where that leads. >> > > There is a new branche for such experiment. Branching is certainly the way > to go, whatever we do regarding the release ! > > I would like to let this thread go for a little bit (let's say a couple of > days), and then, I think we will have to vote : going for 2.0-RC or modify > the code massively. > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
