On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: > There seems to be a pantheon of Future classes. Frankly, it's bewildering. > Also the interface IoFuture is overwrought, JMHO :) Maybe this is > because it's a pre-generics thing.
Why do you think we want to start a 3.0 version :) Seems like trustin re-implemented the full Doug Lea's library, with a slightly different semantic... I just think that the way Futures are used in MINA 2.0 is just wrong... -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
