On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > On 7/14/10 10:47 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Niklas Gustavsson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> We may need to regenerate all of them, but it's really painful. >>> Do we know how far back it is included? >> Checked it myself, affected releases are 2.0.0-M4 and newer. How about >> for a simple fix, we simple delete the JAR in question from the >> release packages? > As the M4, M5..., RC1 are just intermediate milestones, I think we should > just produce a RC1 without the lib (because we might have a regression in > 2.0), and remove the previous jars
IMO, all these M4, M5..., RC1 stuff is just plain silly. We should release and come out with patches. Regards, Alan
