I assume the API will be backwards compatible though, right?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@apache.org> wrote: > On 9/28/10 4:36 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >>> >>> I'm afraid that MINA 3.0 will be a total rewrite, with no way to get >>> fixes >>> from 2.0... I consider 2.0 as dead wood at this point. >> >> Hahaha is this a reference to the crusty "Norwegian Wood" codename that >> someone gave it a while back? > > Not even close to that ! It's just a coincidence... >> >> Regardless yeah sounds like it. No worries then. But why bother forking a >> branch instead just move the current 2.0 trunk to 2.0 branch and start >> writing fresh new code? > > We already have a 2.0 branch. May be we will remove what we have in trunk > and move the 3.0 branch to trunk, now that the 2.0.1 branch has been > created. > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > >
