[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13539561#comment-13539561
]
Bruno Bieth commented on VYSPER-74:
-----------------------------------
Ah.. a shame 'cause it makes much more sense to take the provided resource name
into account (my app relies on it).
The spec actually encourages that behavior: "A server SHOULD accept the
resource identifier provided by the client".
> Use the given bind resource from the client (if provided)
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: VYSPER-74
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-74
> Project: VYSPER
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: client compatibility
> Reporter: David Phillips
> Assignee: Bernd Fondermann
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: resourcebinding.patch
>
>
> If the client provides a resource name to bind we should use it, instead of
> just assigning a UUID and ignoring theirs. This patch fixes that. It also
> checks for dups, and attaches a UUID onto the end of their suggested one.
> Ive changed the way Entity and ResourceId are related. Instead of a resource
> being represented as a String, Ive represented it always as an Entity. I
> think its much cleaner this way.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
