In apache-mina-3.0.0-M1-bin.zip, README.txt refers to LICENSE.txt should be LICENSE
In apache-mina-3.0.0-M1-src.zip, README.txt refers to LICENSE.txt should be LICENSE release.properties present as well as pom.xml.releaseBackup A+ Jeff On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Julien Vermillard <jvermill...@gmail.com>wrote: > I'm agree, I think Mx release are for continuous improvement, so if > the legal stuff is correct and it's functional, I think we should keep > this release running and fix assembly issue for the M2. > > BTW I would like to speed up release and manage to release milestone > every week or two weeks. That would help early MINA 3 adopters which > mainly depend more on maven artifact than on binary tarballs. > > Thanks > -- > Julien Vermillard :::: http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/ > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Le 7/17/13 2:33 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit : > >> Hi, > >> > >> 3rd attempt to cut a release. The binary package now contains just what > is needed, and the Nexus repository now contains the release. > >> > >> > >> A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the vote is not > approved): > >> > >> - GIT tag : "mina-parent-3.0.0-M1" SHA-1 : > "35f5b85e65a367dc57eb045b975bfeff5a0bf3cd" > >> > >> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/repo > >> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/commit/35f5b85e > >> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/tree/35f5b85e > >> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/diff/35f5b85e > >> > >> > >> > >> - Nexus repository: > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-158/ > >> > >> Let us vote : > >> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 3.0.0-M1 > >> [ ] +/- | Abstain > >> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 3.0.0-M1 > >> > >> Thanks ! > >> > > FYI, I think that unless we have some critical issues withthis release, > > we keep the vote going on (btw, please vote...) > > > > I suggest that if the M1 is voted, I start immediately to cut a M2 with > > the fixed release problems. ATM, we need a release to move forward, as > > we have side projects depending on it (ApacheDS for instance is waiting > > for MINA3) > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Cordialement, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.iktek.com > > > -- Jeff MAURY "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling. - Bjarne Stroustrup http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury
