Ashish, just be aware that with UDP, some of your data may never arrive; that's the nature of the protocol.
Paul On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:48 PM Ashish <paliwalash...@gmail.com> wrote: > TCP handles fragmentation at its level, but for UDP you have to do it > at application layer meaning UDP data has to carry message sequences > and then you merge them at receiving end. Here you packets can come in > different order do you got to keep them somewhere before complete > message is constructed. > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:58 AM, tunca <atuncat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Our customer has strange requirement about merging multiple udp/TCP > packages > > to create a single message. > > There is a well defined protocol that defines message boundaries. > > The decoder is working good with TCP packages. It can create a single > > message from multiple TCP packages. > > However when a message is fragmented into multiple packages the do > doDecode > > method always gives the same ioBuffer. > > I'll try 2.0.13 next day. > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://apache-mina.10907.n7.nabble.com/CumulativeProtocolDecoder-and-UDP-tp18927p50274.html > > Sent from the Apache MINA Developer Forum mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > > -- > thanks > ashish > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal >
