Looks like it's a bug in JDK 11; Try JDK 12 and let me know.

https://webtide.com/openjdk-11-and-tls-1-3-issues/

On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 6:41 AM Ratnakar Lingamallu <
lingamallu.ratna...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not sure if I have the privilege to create the JIRA ticket. Please let me
> know if any additional information required.
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 4:09 PM Ratnakar Lingamallu <
> lingamallu.ratna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> We are using Java 11.0.6(I am fine with anything greater than 11.0.6).
>>
>> SSLContext sslCtx = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.3");
>> sslFilter.setEnabledProtocols(new String[] { "SSLv2Hello", "TLSv1.3" 
>> });sslFilter.setEnabledCipherSuites(new String[<list of TLS1.3 cipher 
>> suites>]);
>>
>> Please let me know if any other information required.
>>
>> Tried with Mina 2.1 as well.. it is the same behavior.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 12:07 AM Jonathan Valliere <john...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please create a ticket in JIRA and let us know the version of Java you
>>> are
>>> using and how you configured the TLS.
>>>
>>> I’ll look into it when the ticket is made and I can try to reproduce it.
>>>
>>> Have you tried using MINA 2.1?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 4:53 AM Ratnakar Lingamallu <
>>> lingamallu.ratna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Team,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Currently, we are using Apache Mina in our application(version: 2.0.21)
>>> >
>>> > Our application supports TLS1.2. we would like to support TLS1.3 as
>>> well,
>>> >
>>> > but when we did necessary modifications -  not all requests are coming
>>> to
>>> >
>>> > NioSocketAcceptor. we are not getting all messages to messageReceived
>>> >
>>> > of IoHandlerAdapter,
>>> >
>>> > but the session is getting created.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > *Is apache Mina supports TLSv.13?(either version or 2.0.21 or future
>>> >
>>> > versions)*
>>> >
>>> > Basically not all requests coming to socket(NioSocketAcceptor).
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Appreciate your help. Looking forward to the reply.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Ratnakar
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> L.Ratnakar
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> L.Ratnakar
>

Reply via email to