Thanks. Anything I can do to assist? Although I might only find time the week 
after next because am currently on vacation.

Jul 9, 2022 09:00:21 Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>:

> I do think we need to have a look at it (and I may find some time to do it 
> too, as I'm in vacation in the coming week)
> 
> However, I think we should get this 2.0 out. Ther eis no problem in releasing 
> a fix if needed.
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> On 09/07/2022 07:17, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
>> Sooo… do I need to look into this or was this resolved?
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:51 PM Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     The changes I did were to ensure that any ouutbound data are sent
>>     when a
>>     TLS erroroccurs, because the Alert must be sent no matter what. This is
>>     critical for a client to know what is the cause of the failure
>>     (typically when a bad certificate is provided - expired, revoked,
>>     etc -):
>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5246#section-7.2
>>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5246#section-7.2>
>>     I also checked that in this case an exception is propagated up to the
>>     IoHandler for teh server to be informed about the situuation.
>> 
>>     On 06/07/2022 12:42, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
>>      >   What test are you trying?  Emmanuel made changes from the
>>     original design
>>      > to cause it to throw on the filter.  My original design threw on
>>     the filter
>>      > but only during a subsequent read or write action thereby
>>     enforcing strong
>>      > concurrency within the pipeline.
>>      >
>>      > On Jul 6, 2022 at 3:53:57 AM, Christoph John
>>      > <christoph.j...@macd.com
>>     <mailto:christoph.j...@macd.com>.invalid> wrote:
>>      >
>>      >> Ok, the tests in QuickFIX/J which expect the exception to be
>>     caught in a
>>      >> filter still don't work.
>>      >> I recall that you also did some changes in other Apache projects
>>     to make
>>      >> it work with MINA 2.2.0. Could it be that I also need to adapt
>>     something in
>>      >> this regard?
>>      >>
>>      >> Thanks
>>      >> Chris
>>      >>
>>      >> Jul 5, 2022 18:47:09 Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>>:
>>      >>
>>      >> I have tested that the exception gets propagated before
>>     launching the vote
>>      >> to be clear :-)
>>      >>
>>      >>
>>      >> On 05/07/2022 18:17, Christoph John wrote:
>>      >>
>>      >>> Sorry, no. The last message regarding this was:
>>      >>
>>      >>>
>>      >>
>>      >>> ----------snip---------
>>      >>
>>      >>>
>>      >>
>>      >>> 11.04.2022 09:37:30 Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>>:
>>      >>
>>      >>> Hi Christophe,
>>      >>
>>      >>> sorry, my late mail was off base.
>>      >>
>>      >>> The pb here is that the SSLEngine excpeiton is not propagated
>>     to the
>>      >> handler, when it should.
>>      >>
>>      >>> My guess is that we have some missing call somewhere in the
>>     stack. I'm
>>      >> going to check that out.
>>      >>
>>      >>> On 11/04/2022 00:15, Christoph John wrote:
>>      >>
>>      >>>> Hi,
>>      >>
>>      >>>> thanks Jonathan and Emmanuel for working on this!
>>      >>
>>      >>>> I tried to integrate this into QuickFIX/J and it compiles
>>     successfully.
>>      >> However there are some tests failing that expect an Exception.
>>     For example
>>      >> we have
>>      >>
>>      >>>>
>>      >>
>>     
>> https://github.com/quickfix-j/quickfixj/blob/b6a822a46a5278dcd0985a5a77299ed03168ab03/quickfixj-core/src/test/java/quickfix/mina/ssl/SecureSocketTest.java#L54
>>     
>> <https://github.com/quickfix-j/quickfixj/blob/b6a822a46a5278dcd0985a5a77299ed03168ab03/quickfixj-core/src/test/java/quickfix/mina/ssl/SecureSocketTest.java#L54>
>>      >>
>>      >>>> Up to now it was tried to get the Exception via a filter in
>>     the chain.
>>      >> This no longer seems to work but I think I can see the error
>>     getting thrown
>>      >> in the log:
>>      >>
>>      >>>> SEVERE: SSLHandlerG0@590ec99c[mode=server, connected=false]
>>     task() -
>>      >> storing error {}
>>      >>
>>      >>>> javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No available
>>     authentication scheme
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >> java.base/sun.security.ssl.Alert.createSSLException(Alert.java:131)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >> java.base/sun.security.ssl.Alert.createSSLException(Alert.java:117)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.TransportContext.fatal(TransportContext.java:358)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.TransportContext.fatal(TransportContext.java:314)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.TransportContext.fatal(TransportContext.java:305)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.CertificateMessage$T13CertificateProducer.onProduceCertificate(CertificateMessage.java:972)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.CertificateMessage$T13CertificateProducer.produce(CertificateMessage.java:961)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLHandshake.produce(SSLHandshake.java:440)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.ClientHello$T13ClientHelloConsumer.goServerHello(ClientHello.java:1246)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.ClientHello$T13ClientHelloConsumer.consume(ClientHello.java:1182)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.ClientHello$ClientHelloConsumer.onClientHello(ClientHello.java:840)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.ClientHello$ClientHelloConsumer.consume(ClientHello.java:801)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLHandshake.consume(SSLHandshake.java:396)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.HandshakeContext.dispatch(HandshakeContext.java:480)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLEngineImpl$DelegatedTask$DelegatedAction.run(SSLEngineImpl.java:1277)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLEngineImpl$DelegatedTask$DelegatedAction.run(SSLEngineImpl.java:1264)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:712)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLEngineImpl$DelegatedTask.run(SSLEngineImpl.java:1209)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.filter.ssl.SSLHandlerG0.execute_task(SSLHandlerG0.java:743)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.filter.ssl.SSLHandlerG0.receive_loop(SSLHandlerG0.java:255)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     org.apache.mina.filter.ssl.SSLHandlerG0.receive(SSLHandlerG0.java:162)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     org.apache.mina.filter.ssl.SslFilter.messageReceived(SslFilter.java:342)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.filterchain.DefaultIoFilterChain.callNextMessageReceived(DefaultIoFilterChain.java:650)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.filterchain.DefaultIoFilterChain.access$1300(DefaultIoFilterChain.java:49)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.filterchain.DefaultIoFilterChain$EntryImpl$1.messageReceived(DefaultIoFilterChain.java:1128)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.filterchain.IoFilterAdapter.messageReceived(IoFilterAdapter.java:122)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.filterchain.DefaultIoFilterChain.callNextMessageReceived(DefaultIoFilterChain.java:650)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.filterchain.DefaultIoFilterChain.fireMessageReceived(DefaultIoFilterChain.java:643)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor.read(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:539)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor.access$1200(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:68)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.process(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:1224)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.process(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:1213)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.run(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:683)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> org.apache.mina.util.NamePreservingRunnable.run(NamePreservingRunnable.java:64)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at
>>      >>
>>     
>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
>>      >>
>>      >>>>      at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
>>      >>
>>      >>>> What is the new way to get this Exception?
>>      >>
>>      >>>> NB: I recall discussing this with Jonathan some months ago but
>>     seem to
>>      >> have lost track of the mail thread.
>>      >>
>>      >>>> Thanks in advance,
>>      >>
>>      >>>> Chris.
>>      >>
>>      >>>> On 09.04.22 00:26, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>      >>
>>      >>>>> Hi !
>>      >>
>>      >>>>>
>>      >>
>>      >>>>> I will start to cut a first milestone for the MINA
>>     
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/rt+to+cut+a+first+milestone+for+the+MINA?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>     2.2.X branch. It
>>      >> has been tested on Apache Ftpserver, Ldap API and Directory
>>     Server with
>>      >> success.
>>      >>
>>      >>>>>
>>      >>
>>      >>>>> There will probably be more milestone, but that would be a
>>     first step.
>>      >>
>>      >>>>>
>>      >>
>>      >>>>> The main changes are:
>>      >>
>>      >>>>> - a complete redesign of the TLS handling
>>      >>
>>      >>>>> - the removal of the SslFilter.DISABLE_ENCRYPTION_ONCE attribute,
>>      >> which is either replaced by a dedicated filter, or the
>>     encapsulation of the
>>      >> message in a DisableEncryptWriteRequest interface
>>      >>
>>      >>>>>
>>      >>
>>      >>>>>
>>      >>
>>      >>>>> I'll do that this week-end.
>>      >>
>>      >>>>>
>>      >>
>>      >>>>> Thanks !
>>      >>
>>      >>>>
>>      >>
>>      >>>
>>      >>
>>      >>
>>      >> --
>>      >>
>>      >> *Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
>>      >>
>>      >> T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
>>      >>
>>      >> P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
>>      >>
>>      >> emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com <mailto:emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com>
>>     https://www.busit.com/ <https://www.busit.com/>
>>      >>
>>      >>
>>      >>
>>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>      >>
>>      >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
>>     <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org>
>>      >>
>>      >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>>     <mailto:dev-h...@mina.apache.org>
>>      >>
>>      >>
>>      >>
>>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>      >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
>>     <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org>
>>      >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>>     <mailto:dev-h...@mina.apache.org>
>>      >>
>>      >>
>>      >
>>     --     *Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
>>     T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
>>     P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
>>     emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com <mailto:emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com>
>>     https://www.busit.com/ <https://www.busit.com/>
>>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
>>     <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org>
>>     For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>>     <mailto:dev-h...@mina.apache.org>
>> 
> 
> -- 
> *Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
> T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
> P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
> emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org

Reply via email to