I don’t use Windows.

Jeff


> On Sep 12, 2023, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> You don't remember if you downloaded, built and reviewed all three src or
> tar files? Are you voting without reviewing?
> 
> Gary
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff
>> lately.
>> 
>> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
>> 
>> Jeff
>> 
>>> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
>>> 
>>> Is that for all the MINA versions?
>>> 
>>> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>>>> I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
>>>> [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [INFO]  T E S T S
>>>> [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>>>> [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 0.060 s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>>>> [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
>> elapsed: 0.404 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>>>> [ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer --
>> Time elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
>>>> java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
>>>>        at
>> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
>>>>        at
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>>>>        at
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
>>>>        at
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>        at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
>>>>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
>>>>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
>>>>        at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>>>>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
>>>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
>>>> Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
>>>>        at
>> java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
>>>>        at
>> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:238)
>>>>        at
>> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:258)
>>>>        at
>> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:585)
>>>>        ... 30 more
>>>> Using:
>>>> Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
>>>> Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.4
>>>> Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program
>> Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.8.7-hotspot
>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>> OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>> Gary
>>>> On 2023/09/11 07:42:10 Jeff MAURY wrote:
>>>>> +1.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2 remarks:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   - Does not build with Java 17
>>>>>   - Build is failing on Windows
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 8:11 AM Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@apache.org>
>> a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> hi!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is a vote for a triple release:
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.2.3
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.1.8
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.0.25
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
>>>>>>> DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
>>>>>>> DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session
>>>>>>> object
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Temporary tags have been created (they can be removed if the vote is
>> not
>>>>>>> approved) :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.2.3:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/906884d52990b4fce119c462791abf1a5b577a83
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.1.8:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/c7f164cbeecedb4a4e32ba798e7cf435acdc471a
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.0.25:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/38ca5a9eb01461a7212b3904ff5010d0364d2f41
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The final artifacts are stored in a staging repository:
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.2.3:
>>>>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1086
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.1.8:
>>>>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1085
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.0.25:
>>>>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1087
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The distributions are available for download on :
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.2.3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.3
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.1.8: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.1.8
>>>>>>> * MINA 2.0.25:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.0.25
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Let us vote :
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.3
>>>>>>> [ ] ± | Abstain
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.3
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
>>>>>>> [ ] ± | Abstain
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
>>>>>>> [ ] ± | Abstain
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Cordialement,
>>>>>>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>>>>>>> www.iktek.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually
>>>>> working and scaling.
>>>>> - Bjarne Stroustrup
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.jeffmaury.com
>>>>> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
>>>>> http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury
>>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
>>> T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
>>> P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
>>> emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com/
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org

Reply via email to