Hi Henry,

Thank you very much for the clarification, It's my bad to misunderstand the
meanings of regression and feature.

We have not yet tried to compile the project with Java9 before, the issue
found by Patrick make me realize that the JDK9 has been GA released.

So we are fine with this release candidate, right? Thanks!

Hi Patrick,

I'm really sorry for the confusion.

Best.
Gary









On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I would argue this is not a blocker since the pom.xml define the target
> JVM:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/blob/master/pom.xml#L104
>
> Gary, when you said regression, did you mean it was working with Java9
> before and now it was not?
> If it has not been working with Java9 from beginning this should not be
> release blocker.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
> >                 Thanks for the reply. Currently,Mnemonic doesn't support
> > Java 9 due to incompatible interface changes. We verified the release
> with
> > Java8. (Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-401)  If
> it
> > is a blocker, I will cancel the rc vote. Else, we will fix it in the next
> > release.  Please let us know.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnu
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2017 11:38 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Patrick,
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for the guidance and we will try to figure out how
> to
> > > fix this issue you found.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Gary.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ic. If it's a regression I would personally terminate the rc vote,
> fix
> > > it,
> > > > and then cut a new rc. But that's my personal preference, I don't
> > believe
> > > > there's any specific rule wrt this type of thing. Would suck for
> folks
> > > > using it certainly.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Patrick,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it is a regression, not a feature. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Gary.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is this a feature or a regression?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Patrick and other mentors,
> > > > > > >                   Can you please vote for the release?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Johnu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate
> this
> > > > issue
> > > > > > > > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we
> fix
> > it
> > > > for
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could
> be a
> > > > > blocker
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > this release candidate? Thanks!.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt <
> ph...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> $java -version
> > > > > > > >> java version "9.0.1"
> > > > > > > >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> > > > > > > >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed
> mode)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > > ga...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to
> > compile?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > $java -version
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Best,
> > > > > > > >> > Gary.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <
> > > ph...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > > > > > >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:
> > compile
> > > > > > > >> > > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation
> > > > failure:
> > > > > > > >> > > Compilation failure:
> > > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/
> > main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> > > > > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> > > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> > > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/
> > main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> > > > > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> > > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/
> > main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> > > > > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > > > > >> > > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> > > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George <
> > > > jo...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > > > > > > >> > > > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > > > > > > >> > > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests,
> etc.
> > > can
> > > > be
> > > > > > > found
> > > > > > > >> > at:
> > > > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > > dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0
> > > > .
> > > > > > > >> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > > > > > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > > > > > >> > > > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=
> refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d
> > > > 794690f71b:
> > > > > > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > > > > > >> > > > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=
> 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d
> > > > > > 794690f71b
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > > dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/
> > > > > KEYS
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > > dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/
> > > > > KEYS
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > For information about the contents of this release,
> see:
> > > > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > > dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0
> > > > .
> > > > > > > >> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > > > > > > >> > > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the
> > > > > necessary
> > > > > > > >> items
> > > > > > > >> > > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from
> > source,
> > > > and
> > > > > > > test.
> > > > > > > >> > The
> > > > > > > >> > > > please vote:
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > > > incubating
> > > > > > > >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> > > > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating)
> > > > community
> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to