I've been looking at
some plugins in the sandbox and I see some issues:
1. If sandbox
plugins deploy sites, (as they probably should so they get some visability), the
scm connections are wrong because they inherit from the mojo
parent.
2. Some plugins have
the name maven-xxx-plugin instead of xxx-maven-plugin
3. Many plugins
aren't even posted on the mojo site.
I'd like to have a
vote on these issues:
1a. Should we create
a mojo-sandbox parent and have sandbox plugins derive from here? This way we can
set the scm urls and anything else that comes along here. Only the parent
section would need to change when a plugin graduates from the
sandbox.
-
OR-
1b. Keep deriving
from mojo parent, but add instructions to site to tell devs how to override the
scm connection when added to sandbox and add instructions to guidelines for
release to have devs remember to remove the override when
graduating.
2. Should we correct
the plugin names?
3. Should all
sandbox plugins be added to the mojo sandbox site?
Thx.
